Gender and Development (Independent Evaluation Group Studies)
Contents:
Furthermore, lessons learned and best practices will be identified and recommendations based on the findings formulated. The outcomes of the evaluation will inform as to what extent the project is contributing to the outcomes of the UNDP and UNODC relevant corporate strategic documents, and above towards the operationalization of the SDG agenda. The following are the key evaluation questions:. The Design of a project or programme measures the extent to which the logical framework approach was adopted.
Relevance is the extent to which the activity is suited to the priorities and policies of the target group, recipient and donor. Efficiency measures the outputs - qualitative and quantitative - in relation to the inputs. Effectiveness is a measure of the extent to which an aid activity attains its objectives. Impact is the positive and negative changes produced by a development intervention, directly or indirectly, intended or unintended. Sustainability is concerned with measuring whether the benefits of an activity are likely to continue after donor funding has been withdrawn.
Given that this is a Mid-Term Independent Project Evaluation, the emphasis will be on identifying lessons learnt, with a view to adjusting the project design and implementation accordingly. The MTE will therefore make recommendations for the way forward, based on progress thus far. The evaluation will use methodologies and techniques as determined by the specific needs for information, the questions set out in the ToR for the evaluation and the availability of stakeholders.
The methodologies and approach need to take into account that this is a regional project, covering 15 countries in a geographically scattered region. The evaluation ToR provides basic information as regards to the methodology, which should not be understood as exhaustive.
About Us: Evaluation | UN Women – Headquarters
It is rather meant to guide the evaluation team in elaborating an effective, efficient, and appropriate evaluation methodology that should be proposed, explained and justified in the Inception Report. In addition, the evaluation team will be asked to present a summarized methodology including an evaluation matrix in the Inception Report outlining the evaluation criteria, indicators, sources of information and methods of data collection. While the evaluation team shall fine-tune the methodology for the evaluation in an Inception Report, a mixed-methods approach of qualitative and quantitative methods is mandatory due to its appropriateness to ensure an inclusive methodology.
Special attention shall be paid to an unbiased and objective approach and the triangulation of sources, methods, data, and theories. Indeed, information stemming from secondary sources will be cross-checked and triangulated through data retrieved from primary research methods. Primary data collection methods need to be gender-sensitive as well as inclusive.
The credibility of the data collection and analysis are key to the evaluation. Rival theories and competing explanations must be tested once plausible patterns emerge from triangulating data. The limitations to the evaluation need to be identified and discussed by the evaluation team in the Inception Report, e. Potential limitations as well as the chosen mitigating measures should be discussed.
When designing the evaluation data collection tools and instruments, the evaluation team needs to consider the analysis of certain relevant or innovative topics in the form of short case studies, analyses, etc. Bidders shall be free to propose their own team composition and roles. The team should consist of two experts:. The Team Leader will have expertise in results-based evaluation methodologies.
All products should be well written, inclusive and have a clear analysis process. This assignment will take place between 13 August and 19 December and is output-based. Travel to Fiji and potentially one other Pacific country is required to hold consultations. Stakeholder from other countries will be interviewed via skype or phone due to the vast geographical area covered by the project and expensive and challenging travel options in the region.
Therefore, other work will be home-based. The MTE is expected to take a total of 67 working days: Evaluation interviews and mission: Final evaluation report; presentation of evaluation results; Evaluation Brief 2-pager.
Draft evaluation report should be prepared in line with UNODC evaluation norms, standards, guidelines and templates, including an analysis of the performance of the project to adequately address gender equality as well as human rights issues, with concrete findings, conclusions and recommendations. The final report will be produced by the MTR team based on feedback received on the draft report. The final report will be shared with stakeholders and other partners. The final evaluation report and an Evaluation Brief 2-pager should be prepared in line with UNODC evaluation norms, standards, guidelines and templates.
UN-PRAC will support the logistical arrangements of consultant travels and stakeholder consultations. It was agreed that for this occasion UNODC evaluation norms, standards, guidelines and templates are used for consistency purposes, to avoid potential conflict between the guidelines of the two organizations.
UNDP will oversee the administrative process of recruitment and contracting, with both UNODC and UNDP being given the option of participating in each stage of the selection, including short-listing, reviewing financial proposals, interview panels, etc. Payment will be made after satisfactory acceptance and certification of the deliverables and in accordance with UNDP procedures:.
Consultant must send a financial proposal based on Lump Sum Amount.
- | Independent Evaluation Group;
- Le temps est un grand maigre: ou comment voyage une phrase, de Balzac au poème (Temps Réel) (French .
- ERP Value: Signifikante Vorteile mit ERP-Systemen (Xpert.press) (German Edition).
- How a Digital Piano (or Portable Keyboard) Helps You Learn to Play (How to Book 19)!
- TRANSFORM Issue 1 - The Magazine for Gender Responsive Evaluation by IES UN Women - Issuu;
- Harold Cohen: New Paintings.
- Header Menu.
The contract price will fixed output-based price regardless of extension of the herein specified duration. In general, UNDP shall not accept travel costs exceeding those of an economy class ticket. In the event of unforeseeable travel not anticipated in this TOR, payment of travel costs including tickets, lodging and terminal expenses should be agreed upon, between the respective business unit and the Individual Consultant, prior to travel and will be reimbursed. The award of the contract shall be made to the individual consultant whose offer has been evaluated and.
All applications must be clearly marked with the title of the consultancy and submitted by 20th July Fiji Time electronically to etenderbox.
United Nations Development Programme
For any clarification regarding this assignment please write to Lavenia Rokovucago lavenia. Incomplete applications will not be considered, and only candidates for whom there is further interest will be contacted. You can email etenderbox. UNDP is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture.
Individuals from minority groups, indigenous groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidence.
United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women
If you are experiencing difficulties with online job applications, please contact jobs. Skip to main navigation Skip to language selector Skip to content Skip to footer. Find details on our successes and ongoing work. Office Djibouti Dominican Republic E. Office Gabon Gambia Geneva Rep.
Social Safety Nets and Gender: Learning from Impact Evaluations and World Bank Projects
Home About Us Jobs. In response to multiple requests for consultants with both gender and evaluation expertise, in , IEO launched a publicly accessible Gender and Evaluation Consultant Database GECD providing a link between prospective consultants and institutions in need of evaluators with gender equality expertise. Currently, the database has 70 consultants and it is searchable by keyword, including region, language, and thematic area of expertise. UN Women's Evaluation Handbook provides the tools necessary for the management of all phases of the evaluation process: Regional Evaluation Specialists actively engage with regional groups of evaluation professionals.
Promoting national evaluation capacity development UN Women evaluation principle of participation and inclusiveness is key to evaluation at UN Women. The policy notes that it is particularly important to enable the participation of women and any group subject to discrimination, with the understanding that doing so facilitates consensus building, ownership and use of evaluation findings and recommendations by stakeholders.
Within the framework of EvalPartners, in UN-Women continued its strategic partnership with various partners and evaluation associations to reinforce nationally- owned and driven evaluation aimed at achieving greater gender equality.
This evaluation assesses the effectiveness of the World Bank's gender strategy and the results thereof. Covering the period fiscal , the evaluation. The World Bank. GENDER AND DEVELOPMENT: AN EVALUATION OF WORLD BANK SUPPORT, –08 The Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) is an indepen- dent, three-part used in-depth country case studies. The evaluation .
In this framework, several efforts were made to increase the engagement of parliamentarians in the demand for and use of evaluation in Arab States, and the Asia Pacific, Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean regions. Evaluations produced by decentralized units in Piloted in three countries in , the CPE programme will be rolled out in Evaluation Expenditure of central unit in See the Annual Report on the Evaluation Function The Executive Director is responsible for ensuring the independence of UN Women's evaluation function, and for reporting on evaluation to the Executive Board.
The Director of Evaluation has the authority to sign off on and distribute evaluation reports to the Executive Director without prior clearance from other parties within or outside the organization, and to the Executive Board. Access the report here.
The Corporate Evaluation Plan , which is approved by the Executive Director and presented to the Executive Board, outlines the corporate evaluations to be managed by the Independent Evaluation Office in the period The purpose of the plan is to provide a coherent framework within which useful evaluation evidence is generated systematically on the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and, as far as possible, impact and sustainability, of work under the UN Women Strategic Plan The eventual goal of these evaluations is to support UN Women's mission and help the organization better achieve gender equality and women's empowerment.
Eight key parameters are considered in selecting corporate and decentralized evaluations, to ensure evaluative coverage at the appropriate level of UN Women's key areas of work and its organizational performance: Evaluation is also mandatory when a commitment has been made to key stakeholders donors, Members States, beneficiaries, etc. The Independent Evaluation Office maintains an evaluation quality assurance mechanism to continuously improve and enhance the quality and credibility of UN Women corporate and decentralized evaluations and of the evaluation function overall.
In addition to providing the UN Women Executive Board and management with an independent assessment, the System's executive feedback, detailed analysis and recommendations improve the quality of evaluative evidence and evaluation oversight functions. All final evaluations are assessed by an external independent reviewer. In response to UN Women evaluation reports, Management Responses are issued by the head of the entity being evaluated. These are to be completed via the online GATE System within six weeks of finalizing all independent evaluations.
Subsequently, responses are disseminated to key partners and the implementation of recommendations is monitored by IEO and reported via the Annual Report on the Evaluation Function that is presented every year to the Executive Board. In addition, the IEO is presenting a meta-analysis of all evaluations conducted every other year that will enhance the use of evaluation and in particular for decentralized evaluations. To enhance use of corporate evaluations, IEO launched Transform — a Magazine for Gender-Responsive Evaluation to improve accessibility to information on good practices and lessons learned on what works for gender equality.