Contents:
Sometimes it does not take as long.
One Christmas Day, the Curtises realise they have drifted apart, and decide to end their marriage. But when Mark claims sole custody of Fluffy, their adored dog, . For four years investment analyst Anna has been married to would-be novelist, Mark Curtis. One Christmas Day the Curtises realise they have.
Think of the family members or friends who already know and like this pet. If they cannot take this pet on, they can help broaden the search for a new home. If there is someone identified, be sure that all the family members involved in the senior's care know about it.
The court simply said:. Euthanasia - When it's the Vet's Pet Dr. Really enjoyed this, just a real nice, uncomplicated Christmas romance. It really bothered me that you were supposed to feel this was a happily ever after ending. Preview — Who Gets Fluffy?
Put that person's name and contact information somewhere that is easy to find. It is a good idea to make up a list of medications and dates of care so the new owner can keep up with the pet's health care.
If possible, update the pet's care so the initial cost is not a burden on the new owner. To make the transition easier on the pet, have the same bed, food, food bowls, time of day of feeding, walking schedule and other routines the same. Dogs especially thrive on routine.
Cats need to have the routine maintained also. How can I Tell what my Pet is Thinking? What do I do? Euthanasia - When it's the Vet's Pet Dr. Foote's Paw Prints Vegetarian Dogs?
Integrative Medicine for Pets? My Cat Won't Eat!
My House is Not a Litter Box! Acting Like a Puppy? Here Kitty Kitty Tularemia - What is it? Torok , the court described the case in these terms:. More recently, in Grimalyuk v. The court simply said:. Grimalyuk is legal ownership of two dogs and one cat that are legally owned by Mr.
Concelos but have been living with and cared for by Ms. Grimalyuk since the date of separation. I order that Mr. Concelos transfer legal ownership of these three pets to Ms. In the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Warnica v. The Family Court only has jurisdiction if the claim involving cohabiting spouses. On the other hand, in that same year a more patient and didactic court in Newfoundland took an entirely different approach. In the decision in Simmonds v. Simmonds , the court considered the custody of a dog, and said:.

Personal property includes all property other than land, an interest in land or anything attached to it. The owner could maintain trover [an ancient remedy to recover the value of personal chattels wrongfully converted by another to his own use] for them, and retained his property in them if they strayed or were lost. Curiously enough a dog, though a domestic animal, was not the subject of larceny [theft] at common law. The Applicant has been responsible for the dog in the interim and has paid the costs of its maintenance and care.
I am sure that both parties and their children have become quite attached to the animal but the issue has been put and it must be resolved. The dog is a matrimonial asset but it is, without being facetious, indivisible. The Applicant has had that dog continuously since separation and may retain it. Notwithstanding the fact that courts are sometimes willing to resolve pet custody disputes, it is probably best for separating couples to spare the cost and aggravation by coming to terms on their own, with the help of their lawyers.
At Russell Alexander, Family Lawyers our focus is exclusively family law, offering pre-separation legal advice and assisting clients with family related issues including: For more information, visit www.